DIY History | Transcribe | Building the Transcontinental Railroad | New York Supreme Court case: Thomas C. Durant versus The Union Pacific Railroad, New York, N.Y., 1872-1881

Transcribe
Translate

New York Supreme Court case: Thomas C. Durant versus The Union Pacific Railroad, New York, N.Y., 1872-1881

Front

Supreme Court.
Thomas C. Durant & all

      v

The Union Pacific RR Co.
Jay Gould & James S Smith etal

Time to serve Complaint is hereby extended Ten (10) days from date.---

Septbr 22d 1875-

   [Shiaman & Sterling?]

Attys for defendants above named
Time to serve Complaint is hereby further extended twenty days from date---
October 4th 1875        [Shiarmont  Sterling?]
attys for defts abovenamed
Time to serve Complaint is hereby extended
30 days from date-------
October 21. 1875.
[Ernott?] Burnett & Hammond
Atty's for deft Dillon.
Shiarmont Sterling
Attys for defts. U.P.RR. Co.

Gould & Smith  2

Time further extended as above to serve complaints
30 days from date
November 20. 1875.
Ernott Burnett & Hammond
Atty's for deft Dillon
Shiarmont Sterling
Attys for defts. U.P.RR Co.
Gould & Smith

Saving...

Supreme Court. Thomas C. Durant & all v The Union Pacific RR Co. Jay Gould & James S Smith etal Time to serve Complaint is hereby extended Ten (10) days from date.--- Septbr 22d 1875- [Shiaman & Sterling?] Attys for defendants above named Time to serve Complaint is hereby further extended twenty days from date--- October 4th 1875 [Shiarmont Sterling?] attys for defts abovenamed Time to serve Complaint is hereby extended 30 days from date------- October 21. 1875. [Ernott?] Burnett & Hammond Atty's for deft Dillon. Shiarmont Sterling Attys for defts. U.P.RR. Co. Gould & Smith 2 Time further extended as above to serve complaints 30 days from date November 20. 1875. Ernott Burnett & Hammond Atty's for deft Dillon Shiarmont Sterling Attys for defts. U.P.RR Co. Gould & Smith