Transcribe
Translate
Affirmative Action policy, 1985, 1988
1985-10-01 Affirmative Action EEO Policy Page 19
More information
digital collection
archival collection guide
transcription tips
UTILIZATION ANALYSIS WORKSHEET [underlined]DISTRICT 2[inserted] - Ft. Dodge[/inserted][/underlined] (DEPARTMENT OR DIVISION) MINORITY REPRESENTATION 2.70% [underlined]July 1, 1985[/underlined] (DATE) [table (with edges missing) has 15 columns] [?Occupational?] Category [column A] | Total Employees # [column B] | Employees by Sex: Women # [column C] | Employees by Sex: Men # [column D] | Employees by Minority Status: Total Ethnic Minority # [column E] | Employees by Minority Status: Black # [column F] | Employees by Minority Status: Hispanic # [column G] | Employees by Minority Status: Asn/PI [?Asian/Pacific Islander?] # [column H] | Employees by Minority Status: AI [?American Indian/Native Alaskan?] # [column I] | Labor Market Representation by EEO Class and by Occupational Category: Women % [column J] | Labor Market Representation by EEO Class and by Occupational Category: Men % [column K] | Labor Market Representation by EEO Class and by Occupational Category: Caucasian % [column L] | Labor Market Representation by EEO Class and by Occupational Category: Ethnic Minority % [column M] | Underutilization: Women: (+(B x J - C)) = N [column N] | Underutilization: Minorit[?y?]: (+(B x M - E)) = O [column O] | ------------------------------------ 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25.4 | 74.6 | 98.1 | 1.9 | - 0.48 | - 0.11 ------------------------------------ 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 47.1 | 52.9 | 97.6 | 2.4 | + 0.75 | + 0.38 ------------------------------------ 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - ------------------------------------ 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - ------------------------------------ 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 95.8 | 4.2 | 98.3 | 1.7 | + 0.21 | - 0.09 ------------------------------------ 6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - ------------------------------------ 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - ------------------------------------ A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O ------------------------------------ [/table] [underlined][?Oc?]cupational Categories:[/underlined] Executive/Administrative/Magerial Professional (a) Faculty (b) Non-Faculty Technicians/Skilled Craftsmen Protective Services Para professionals Secretarial/Clerical Service/Maintenance [underlined]Labor Market Recruitment Area - Statewide Para-Professional and Clerical - Audubon, Calhoun, Carroll, Crawford, Greene, Guthrie, Hamilton, Humboldt, Pocahontas, Sac, Webster, and Wright Counties.[/underlined] EEO Class Codes (See Definition[?s):?] E-Total - All Non-White F-Black - Not of Hispanic Origi[?n?] G-Hispanic - Spanish descent H-Asian/Pacific Islander I-American Indian/Native Alaska[?n?] [underlined]Formula:[/underlined] (BxJ) +- C = N (Women) (BxM) +[?-?] E = O (Ethnic - Minorit[?y) ?] [? These 2 formulas are each written in two different ways. Also side of one formula is cut off. ?]
Saving...
prev
next
UTILIZATION ANALYSIS WORKSHEET [underlined]DISTRICT 2[inserted] - Ft. Dodge[/inserted][/underlined] (DEPARTMENT OR DIVISION) MINORITY REPRESENTATION 2.70% [underlined]July 1, 1985[/underlined] (DATE) [table (with edges missing) has 15 columns] [?Occupational?] Category [column A] | Total Employees # [column B] | Employees by Sex: Women # [column C] | Employees by Sex: Men # [column D] | Employees by Minority Status: Total Ethnic Minority # [column E] | Employees by Minority Status: Black # [column F] | Employees by Minority Status: Hispanic # [column G] | Employees by Minority Status: Asn/PI [?Asian/Pacific Islander?] # [column H] | Employees by Minority Status: AI [?American Indian/Native Alaskan?] # [column I] | Labor Market Representation by EEO Class and by Occupational Category: Women % [column J] | Labor Market Representation by EEO Class and by Occupational Category: Men % [column K] | Labor Market Representation by EEO Class and by Occupational Category: Caucasian % [column L] | Labor Market Representation by EEO Class and by Occupational Category: Ethnic Minority % [column M] | Underutilization: Women: (+(B x J - C)) = N [column N] | Underutilization: Minorit[?y?]: (+(B x M - E)) = O [column O] | ------------------------------------ 1 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25.4 | 74.6 | 98.1 | 1.9 | - 0.48 | - 0.11 ------------------------------------ 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 47.1 | 52.9 | 97.6 | 2.4 | + 0.75 | + 0.38 ------------------------------------ 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - ------------------------------------ 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - ------------------------------------ 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 95.8 | 4.2 | 98.3 | 1.7 | + 0.21 | - 0.09 ------------------------------------ 6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - ------------------------------------ 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - ------------------------------------ A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O ------------------------------------ [/table] [underlined][?Oc?]cupational Categories:[/underlined] Executive/Administrative/Magerial Professional (a) Faculty (b) Non-Faculty Technicians/Skilled Craftsmen Protective Services Para professionals Secretarial/Clerical Service/Maintenance [underlined]Labor Market Recruitment Area - Statewide Para-Professional and Clerical - Audubon, Calhoun, Carroll, Crawford, Greene, Guthrie, Hamilton, Humboldt, Pocahontas, Sac, Webster, and Wright Counties.[/underlined] EEO Class Codes (See Definition[?s):?] E-Total - All Non-White F-Black - Not of Hispanic Origi[?n?] G-Hispanic - Spanish descent H-Asian/Pacific Islander I-American Indian/Native Alaska[?n?] [underlined]Formula:[/underlined] (BxJ) +- C = N (Women) (BxM) +[?-?] E = O (Ethnic - Minorit[?y) ?] [? These 2 formulas are each written in two different ways. Also side of one formula is cut off. ?]
Campus Culture
sidebar
