Transcribe
Translate
En Garde, whole no. 8, December 1943
Page 7
More information
digital collection
archival collection guide
transcription tips
page 7. RAHUUN TA-KA: No, no! Not that! Not the End---after we've got so used to it. It's just like suddenly destroying all the atmosphere on the earth (or Mars)---leaves one with such a sense of loss. GUTETO: Interesting issue. You make a good point anent Basic. Thanks for support of Slan Center proposal. SARDONYX: Travels With A Donkey was good---but definitely. Review column very interesting if rather short. Listening Post well worth studying, and many thanks for it. Retrospecting as on page one is always appealing. Does article on Slan Center this issue of EG clarify things any? THE NUCLEUS: We love your rambling fanzine even if we don't agree with some of your ideas. You've brought up the Negro question and there will doubtless be more discussion on it. The forthcoming NOVA was to have articles by both Ackerman and Speer on that subject. But after the race riots and general strong feeling, we decided not to run them in NOVA with its wider circulation. Perhaps we'll include them in the next En Garde. SATYRIC: Subaqueous Romance completely charming. A number of laughs in the rest of hte issue. Thumbs up. HORIZONS: Looks like the new Editor is solving your Post-Mailing worries for you. Reviews right up to their fascinating best and usually one of the highlights of the mag to us. We add our voice to the clamor for clearly setting off the titles being reviewed. Last half of mag very hard to read due to sparsity of ink. THE SCIENCE FICTION SAVANT: Nice start Raym. Try Swisher, the Official Editor, for back issues of En Garde, or any other FAPA publication. Autobiography very interesting. BROWSING: A fanzine thoroughly welcome to the lover and collector of books, and we're a couple of 'em. Keep up the good work, Mike. We've never seen any cause for worry about any harmful mental effect from dreaming. Have never achieved any time-travel dreams yet, a la Dunne, but we're working on it and might manage one of these nites. SUSTAINING PROGRAM: We wallowed in the Review column as we always do in yours. All too often your comments are too brief to allow for further comment on them, but they're entirely enjoyable. The Speech That SF Built was rather well done and the metaphor apt. Slumming Expedition swell but not long enough. Geographical placing of fans a good idea. Thanks for straightening out the English locations and saving us the work. EN GARDE: That very retching cover still disturbs our dreams and undermines our appetite. INSPIRATION: A particularly interesting issue of thoughts on this and that. Those "Dressed Up" Westerns put the point across admirably. Fandom is just a hobby to us too, but perhaps the word happy holds a fuller meaning for us. You may be right in most cases in regard to the activity of the fans in particular. Probably more of 'em could do more but under the circumstances we forgive the slackers.
Saving...
prev
next
page 7. RAHUUN TA-KA: No, no! Not that! Not the End---after we've got so used to it. It's just like suddenly destroying all the atmosphere on the earth (or Mars)---leaves one with such a sense of loss. GUTETO: Interesting issue. You make a good point anent Basic. Thanks for support of Slan Center proposal. SARDONYX: Travels With A Donkey was good---but definitely. Review column very interesting if rather short. Listening Post well worth studying, and many thanks for it. Retrospecting as on page one is always appealing. Does article on Slan Center this issue of EG clarify things any? THE NUCLEUS: We love your rambling fanzine even if we don't agree with some of your ideas. You've brought up the Negro question and there will doubtless be more discussion on it. The forthcoming NOVA was to have articles by both Ackerman and Speer on that subject. But after the race riots and general strong feeling, we decided not to run them in NOVA with its wider circulation. Perhaps we'll include them in the next En Garde. SATYRIC: Subaqueous Romance completely charming. A number of laughs in the rest of hte issue. Thumbs up. HORIZONS: Looks like the new Editor is solving your Post-Mailing worries for you. Reviews right up to their fascinating best and usually one of the highlights of the mag to us. We add our voice to the clamor for clearly setting off the titles being reviewed. Last half of mag very hard to read due to sparsity of ink. THE SCIENCE FICTION SAVANT: Nice start Raym. Try Swisher, the Official Editor, for back issues of En Garde, or any other FAPA publication. Autobiography very interesting. BROWSING: A fanzine thoroughly welcome to the lover and collector of books, and we're a couple of 'em. Keep up the good work, Mike. We've never seen any cause for worry about any harmful mental effect from dreaming. Have never achieved any time-travel dreams yet, a la Dunne, but we're working on it and might manage one of these nites. SUSTAINING PROGRAM: We wallowed in the Review column as we always do in yours. All too often your comments are too brief to allow for further comment on them, but they're entirely enjoyable. The Speech That SF Built was rather well done and the metaphor apt. Slumming Expedition swell but not long enough. Geographical placing of fans a good idea. Thanks for straightening out the English locations and saving us the work. EN GARDE: That very retching cover still disturbs our dreams and undermines our appetite. INSPIRATION: A particularly interesting issue of thoughts on this and that. Those "Dressed Up" Westerns put the point across admirably. Fandom is just a hobby to us too, but perhaps the word happy holds a fuller meaning for us. You may be right in most cases in regard to the activity of the fans in particular. Probably more of 'em could do more but under the circumstances we forgive the slackers.
Hevelin Fanzines
sidebar
